RE: Implementation Experience: INCORRECT usage of xsi:type in Union Types

APOLOGIZE, I have no clue what you talking about. This is not a prose issue.
It is an IMPLEMENTATION ISSUE. PLEASE.

-- Asir
-----Original Message-----
From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 11:11 AM
To: asirv@webmethods.com
Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3. org; w3c-xml-schema-ig; Ningang chen
Subject: Re: Implementation Experience: INCORRECT usage of xsi:type in
Union Types


This case is specifically catered for, I sure _hope_ I got it right.

The constraint you referenced [1] in turn references [2], which
specifically allows member from union (clause 1.2.2.4).

ht

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xmlschema-1-20001024/#cos-ct-derived-ok
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xmlschema-1-20001024/#cos-st-derived-ok
--
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/