Re: Implementation Experience: INCORRECT usage of xsi:type in Union Types from Henry S. Thompson on 2000-11-03 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from October to December 2000)

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 03 Nov 2000 16:10:45 +0000
To: <asirv@webmethods.com>
Cc: "www-xml-schema-comments@w3. org" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>, "w3c-xml-schema-ig" <w3c-xml-schema-ig@w3.org>, "Ningang chen" <nchen@webmethods.com>
Message-ID: <f5br94tf33u.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>

This case is specifically catered for, I sure _hope_ I got it right.

The constraint you referenced [1] in turn references [2], which
specifically allows member from union (clause 1.2.2.4).

ht

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xmlschema-1-20001024/#cos-ct-derived-ok
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xmlschema-1-20001024/#cos-st-derived-ok
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

Received on Friday, 3 November 2000 11:11:00 UTC