W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2000

RE: Simpletype child should be allowed in <list>

From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:37:44 -0700
Message-Id: <376E771642C1D2118DC300805FEAAF4386DF1C@pars-exch-1.ca.kp.org>
To: "'Mark Swinkels'" <MarkSw@Attachmate.com>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Mark Swinkels [SMTP:MarkSw@Attachmate.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, October 11, 2000 10:15 AM
> To:	www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> Subject:	Simpletype child should be allowed in <list>
> 
> For consistency and to avoid the unnecessary introduction of named types
> it
> seems that <list> should allow for a simpleType child as well as the
> existing 'itemType' attribute. This would bring it into line with
> restriction and union which both allow anonymous simpleType children.
> 
Again, mia culpa.  Another editing error on my part in the Sept 22 draft.  A
single simpleType child is allowed for list (making the itemType attribute
and simpleType child mutually exclusive).  For confirmation, see the
declaration of the xsd:list element in the schema for datatypes [1].

pvb

References
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xmlschema-2-20000922/#schema
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2000 13:51:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:48 GMT