Gentlepeople, I am reading the XML Schema Part 0: Primer (dated 2000-10-06) and noted a small typographical error that I believe to be worth correcting before final approval of the Recommendation: In Section 2.3.2, Union Types, the first paragraph states "The zipList union type...", but the immediately following example actually defines a type named zipUnion. The two typename uses should be made the same. If I have erred in my conclusion, please enlighten me. Thanks, Jim ======================================================================== Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* Phone: +1.801.942.0144 Oracle Corporation Oracle Email: mailto:jim.melton@oracle.com 1930 Viscounti Drive Standards email: mailto:jim.melton@acm.org Sandy, UT 84093-1063 Personal email: mailto:jim.melton@acm.org USA Fax : +1.801.942.3345 ======================================================================== = Facts are facts. However, any opinions expressed are the opinions = = only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody = = else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand. = ========================================================================Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2000 15:11:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:48 GMT