W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2000

LC 77 and LC 122 proposed response

From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:33:44 -0700
Message-Id: <376E771642C1D2118DC300805FEAAF4386DCDD@pars-exch-1.ca.kp.org>
To: "'www-xml-schema-comments'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Cc: "'Swick, Ralph'" <swick@w3.org>, "'Arnold, Curt'" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>, "'w3c-xml-schema-ig'" <w3c-xml-schema-ig@w3.org>
I have been asked by the Schema WG to send the following response to the
last call comments [1] and [2], which have been given the labels LC 122 [3]
and LC 77 [4] for tracking purposes.

Thanx to both of the original commentors for raising this issue.  The
datatypes editors had intended all along to do what was requested (move the
has-facet and has-property elements outside the schema namespace *and*
provide a schema [with documentation] for their semantics and use), but just
didn't have the time prior issuing the Last Call WD.

I new (internal) point-release of the XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes spec is
now available [5], which includes the proposed resolution of these issues.
If the proposed resolution does not adequately satisfy your request, or if
need additional clarification on this subject, please let me know.


[3] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/xmlschema-current/lcissues.html#ns-hasfacet
[4] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/xmlschema-current/lcissues.html#has-facet-ns
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/2000Jul/0029.html
Received on Tuesday, 18 July 2000 12:57:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:53 UTC