From: Dave Hollander <dmh@commerce.net> > PS. Regarding "heavy" schemas: I do not see why someone could not > use a sub-set of XML Schemas to achieve a easy to learn and use > schema language. If anyone has ideas on this application profile, > let me know. Such a sub-set could have tremendous utility, both for simplified implementations and as a means of learning the larger schema. I think it should be possible, though I have no idea of the effort required, to define a standard subset roughly equivalent to DTDs. But I suspect such a standard would have great value. Bill la ForgeReceived on Thursday, 10 February 2000 20:55:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:46 GMT