W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2000

3.4/3.13: should there be a Simply Type Definition of the Ur-Type ?

From: James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 04:20:18 -0400
Message-ID: <81A48CA1E953D211B11600A0C9E1C1B995B72F@mail.bowstreet.com>
To: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>

I thought there used to be a Simple Type Definition of the Ur-Type? Should
there be one in 3.13 parallel to the one for Complex Types in 3.4? Or am I
missing something?

James
--
James Tauber
jtauber@bowstreet.com
Director XML Technology
Bowstreet www.bowstreet.com
Received on Friday, 28 April 2000 04:22:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:52 UTC