W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 1999

Evolution of schema language

From: Mike Spreitzer <spreitze@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 14:39:35 PDT
To: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Cc: "Mike Spreitzer" <spreitze@parc.xerox.com>
Message-ID: <003001bed2f8$5c245580$27d1000d@deimos.parc.xerox.com>
It's not clear to me (did I just forget?) whether Structural Requirement 6
("evolution of schemata") includes evolution of the schema language.  It
would be better if that requirement were clearer about what is and is not
intended.  Further, I think evolution of the schema language should be

The current Structures draft continues to say that the "model" of the
schema schema is "closed", meaning that the schema language is not
evolvable.  I think this is bad.

Mike Spreitzer <spreitze@parc.xerox.com>
http://parcweb.parc/spreitze/ (Xerox internal)
http://www.parc.xerox.com/spreitze/ (external)
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 1999 17:39:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:51 UTC