Re: Comments on the XPath data model, from a DOM perspective.

Paul Cotton wrote:

>>I don't know how this posting wound up here
>>
>
>I am sorry Ray but you originally posted your comments to this list not
>the xpath comments list.  See [1].
>
When I know I have submitted comments, I tend to go back and look at the 
spec to see the address I clicked on to find out what hole they dropped 
into where went when I get no response.  I erroneously looked at the 
xpath spec instead of the xpath data model spec.

Can we get clarification on where to post to and continue the dialog?  I 
find there is great confusion in where the comments should be handled, 
as reflected in:

1.  Yesterday different parts of the XPath specification apparently 
pointing to different lists -- w3c-xml-query-comments and 
w3c-xpath-comments -- for responses.
2.  Responses in this thread saying I should go to xpath-comments even 
though the xpath data model spec pointed to this list.
3.  Apparent changes in the specifications posted since yesterday saying 
that I should go to yet another list public-qt-comments.

Where can I expect to see responses to previously-posted issues, or am I 
expected to carry the unresolved issues to the new location, assuming 
the change was intentional.

Thanks,

Ray Whitmer
rayw@netscape.com