- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 14:21:30 +0000
- To: www-xml-query-comments@w3.org
Hi, I think it's confusing to call the attribute node constructors attribute-complex-node and attribute-simple-node. This naming scheme is the same as that used for the element constructors, but there it makes sense because the type of an element may be either complex or simple. Attributes, on the other hand, can only have a simple type. I think that either a unified constructor or two constructors named attribute-list-node and attribute-atom-node would be more appropriate. Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/
Received on Sunday, 13 January 2002 09:22:33 UTC