W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > October to December 2007

Re: XML Base and "valid XML Resource Identifiers"

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:01:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D302092FA618@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org>, "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>

Michael,

At [1] you commented on the XML Base PER [2] saying that 
the term XML Resource Identifier was not well defined
(e.g., soggy, built on sand).

This started quite a process (several, in fact, some of
which turned out to be dead ends).  At the present time,
our plan is to:

1.  Change terminology to talk of "legacy extended IRIs"
or LEIRI's.

2.  Have LEIRI's defined by a revision of the IRI RFC.

3.  Change XML Base (and XLink 1.1 [3] and probably other
XML-related specs) to reference the definition of LEIRI's 
in the IRI RFC.

We will have to wait to move XML Base and XLink 1.1 forward
until the revised IRI RFC is referenceable, but at this time
I'd like to ask you to see the definition of LEIRI in the
latest IRI draft at [4] to see if this will address your
concerns.

paul

[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2007JanMar/
0001
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/PER-xmlbase-20061220/
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/
[4] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-iri-bis-01.txt
   see section 7.
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2007 16:02:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:26 UTC