W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > January to March 2006

[closed] Re: Outstanding comments on XLink 1.1

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:43:06 -0500
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, Henry Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <87hd70mxv9.fsf_-_@nwalsh.com>
/ Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> was heard to say:
| On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:07:01 +0100, Norman Walsh
| <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>  wrote:
|> / Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> was heard to say:
|> | Given that there are still quite some outstanding issues[1] on XLink
|> | 1.1  it is unclear to me how it can proceed to CR[2].
|>
|> The working group believes that it has addressed the issues (if you think
|> I missed one, please let me know.)
|
| Well, replies to several of my oustanding comments were missing when I
| saw  that the moving to CR fase was initiated and in fact a reply to
| at least  one comment has still not been recieved[1]. In the mean
| time, some  responses from the WG have been rejected as well for as
| far as I can see  valid reasons so it is still unclear to me how it
| can proceed to CR given  that. Anyway, given how it goes I assume the
| XML Core WG wants to address  all comments raised against XLink 1.1 so
| all should be fine.

Thank you.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2006 15:43:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:46 GMT