W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Outstanding comments on XLink 1.1

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 01:22:23 +0100
To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, "Henry Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <op.s3wrblsi64w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:07:01 +0100, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>  
wrote:
> / Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> was heard to say:
> | Given that there are still quite some outstanding issues[1] on XLink
> | 1.1  it is unclear to me how it can proceed to CR[2].
>
> The working group believes that it has addressed the issues (if you think
> I missed one, please let me know.)

Well, replies to several of my oustanding comments were missing when I saw  
that the moving to CR fase was initiated and in fact a reply to at least  
one comment has still not been recieved[1]. In the mean time, some  
responses from the WG have been rejected as well for as far as I can see  
valid reasons so it is still unclear to me how it can proceed to CR given  
that. Anyway, given how it goes I assume the XML Core WG wants to address  
all comments raised against XLink 1.1 so all should be fine.


[1]<http://www.w3.org/mid/20050804130243.u595pa5hnngg80w0@webmail.annevankesteren.nl>


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 00:22:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:46 GMT