W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: [xlink11] error handling

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 00:24:39 +0100
To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>, "Anne van Kesteren" <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.s3yjbdb064w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:39:02 +0100, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>  
wrote:
> | Currently it is undefined for example what UAs should do when the  
> elements
> | mentioned in section 4.2 are not direct children but descendants.  
> Should the UA
> | do all that is possible to show information to the user or must it  
> only check
> | the children?
>
> Section 4.2 seems clear. It lists the parent/child relationships that are
> significant and states that other combinations are not conformant.

Non conformant and error handling are quite distinct topics. Did the WG  
perhaps misunderstood the comment?


> | I suggest that the specification gets a normative error handling  
> section.
>
> Please see the thread that begins at 0013.

I don't see how  
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2006JanMar/0013>  
(or any of the subsequent e-mails) relates to my issue. Note that this was  
an example.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 23:24:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:46 GMT