- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:01:20 -0500
- To: "Ron Daniel" <rdaniel@taxonomystrategies.com>
- Cc: <www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org>, <w3c-xml-linking-wg@w3.org>, "'XML Signature'" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
On Sunday 27 October 2002 04:50 pm, Ron Daniel wrote: > On Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:55 AM, Joseph Reagle wrote: > >> On Wednesday 16 October 2002 03:14 am, Ron Daniel wrote: > >> Yes, 'barename' is history. > > > >XML Signature specifications make a lot of use of this term. Is there > > any specific motivation/reason it is being deprecated? > > Sorry, I was not aware of that. We are retaining 'shorthand pointer' > as the normative term, but now define it using: > > A shorthand pointer, formerly known as a barename, consists of > an NCName alone. That's helpful, thank you.
Received on Monday, 28 October 2002 10:01:06 UTC