W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: minor comments for WD-xptr-20010108

From: Eve L. Maler <eve.maler@east.sun.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:34:03 -0500
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010314102325.00a3fbd0@abnaki.east.sun.com>
To: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Hello Susan,

Thank you for your comments on the XPointer specification.  The Working 
Group has discussed them and produced the following resolution:

At 06:09 PM 1/14/01 -0800, Susan Lesch wrote:
>Here are just a few minor comments on your Last Call Working Draft
>of XPointer [1].
>
>The RFC 2119 key words are listed under 3, but are used throughout.
>Would it make more sense to place that definition under 1.2?

Accept.

>In 4.2.1 and 5.4.2, whitespace -> white space (if you want to
>follow XML 1.0, see http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-white-space).

Accept.

>In A.2 References, I imagine that you will update the editors and
>date of XIS.

Accept.

>Deleting rowspan="1" colspan="1", and the thead and tbody elements
>from the tables in 4.1.3 will save a few bytes in file size. Is
>there some kind of production script that inserts these? It's
>hardly a problem in XPointer, but adds up in other XML specs with
>more tables.

Accept the comment; fix by fixing the DTD (as discussed on the spec-prod 
list recently).

If you do not (for some reason :-) accept our resolution on any item, 
please let us know by responding to this message.  We are on a tight 
schedule, so please respond by 28 March.

         Eve
--
Eve Maler                                             +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Development  eve.maler @ east.sun.com
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2001 10:31:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:41 GMT