W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > October to December 2000

Re: Your comments on XLink CR

From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:37:55 -0600
Message-Id: <3.0.32.20001212113639.014f9a14@pophost.arbortext.com>
To: Daniel.Veillard@w3.org
Cc: "Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@East.Sun.COM>, Daniel.Veillard@w3.org, w3c-xsl-link-tf@w3.org, www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
At 18:10 2000 12 12 +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>  Hum, right but that's an XPointer issue, under

True.

>  http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/10/xptr-CR-comments.html#N529
>    Issue (ranges-again)

Actually, #N529 points to Section 2.2 in general, and the 
"ranges-again" issue--illogically at it appears--is at:
http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/10/xptr-CR-comments.html#wg-i18n-escaping11

>I forgot to send a mail about it, sorry,

Are you planning to?  I think I've made it pretty clear many
times over the past several years that I have a problem
with XPointer and that I plan to indicate my concern when
this spec finally gets to the point that the AC gets to vote
on it (much as I suspect that's spitting into the wind), so
it's probably going to look odd if you don't send mail asking
me if I'm satisfied with this decision, since I am not, and
I plan to say so when I send in my vote.

paul

>Daniel
>
>On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:50:41AM -0600, Paul Grosso wrote:
>> I thought we had discussed submitting a comment requesting
>> that XPointer define a more minimal subset that, among other
>> things, did not include range.  Did we not submit such a comment?
>> 
>> At 09:25 2000 12 12 -0500, Eve L. Maler wrote:
>> >Having personally submitted the comments and then implemented the changes 
>> >:-), I'm satisfied.  If there's anyone else on the TF who is *not* 
>> >satisfied, please speak up by the end of this week.
>> >
>> >         Eve
>> >
>> >At 11:40 AM 12/12/00 +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>> >>   Hi,
>> >>
>> >>In order to formally close the loop to request PR, it would be
>> >>nice if you could review the XLink CR Disposition of Comments
>> >>items concerning the point raised by the Task Force:
>> >>
>> >>   http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/10/xlink-CR-comments.html#N529
>> >>
>> >>I think the XML Linking WG tried to comply as much as possible,
>> >>i.e. 2 items were accepted and the two other ones were postponed
>> >>for a later revision.
>> >>Could you indicate if you accept the Working Group decision on
>> >>those issues ?
>> >>
>> >>   thanks in advance,
>> >>
>> >>Daniel
>> >>
>> >>P.S.: what is blocking the publication of the "XML Linking and Style"
>> >>       NOTE ? Do you think you will get the resources to get this out
>> >>       beginning of January (or earlier ?)
>> >>
>> >>--
>> >>Daniel.Veillard@w3.org | W3C, INRIA Rhone-Alpes  | libxml Gnome XML toolkit
>> >>Tel : +33 476 615 257  | 655, avenue de l'Europe | http://xmlsoft.org/
>> >>Fax : +33 476 615 207  | 38330 Montbonnot FRANCE | Rpmfind search site
>> >>  http://www.w3.org/People/all#veillard%40w3.org  | http://rpmfind.net/
>> >
>> >--
>> >Eve Maler                                          +1 781 442 3190
>> >Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center    eve.maler @ east.sun.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>-- 
>Daniel.Veillard@w3.org | W3C, INRIA Rhone-Alpes  | libxml Gnome XML toolkit
>Tel : +33 476 615 257  | 655, avenue de l'Europe | http://xmlsoft.org/
>Fax : +33 476 615 207  | 38330 Montbonnot FRANCE | Rpmfind search site
> http://www.w3.org/People/all#veillard%40w3.org  | http://rpmfind.net/
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2000 12:37:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:41 GMT