On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:37:55AM -0600, Paul Grosso wrote: > >I forgot to send a mail about it, sorry, > > Are you planning to? I consider the previous mail sufficient, ain't it so ? > I think I've made it pretty clear many > times over the past several years that I have a problem > with XPointer and that I plan to indicate my concern when > this spec finally gets to the point that the AC gets to vote > on it (much as I suspect that's spitting into the wind), so > it's probably going to look odd if you don't send mail asking > me if I'm satisfied with this decision, since I am not, and > I plan to say so when I send in my vote. Sure, this is expected. Daniel -- Daniel.Veillard@w3.org | W3C, INRIA Rhone-Alpes | libxml Gnome XML toolkit Tel : +33 476 615 257 | 655, avenue de l'Europe | http://xmlsoft.org/ Fax : +33 476 615 207 | 38330 Montbonnot FRANCE | Rpmfind search site http://www.w3.org/People/all#veillard%40w3.org | http://rpmfind.net/Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2000 13:01:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:41 GMT