W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > October to December 2000

Re: XPointer - some typos?

From: Eve L. Maler <eve.maler@east.sun.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 10:59:02 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001004105843.00d5fc50@abnaki.east.sun.com>
To: jiratj@idoox.com
Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Thank you; we are planning to fix this.

         Eve

At 11:45 AM 10/4/00 +0200, Jiri Jirat wrote:
>Hello,
>  I have read the the version
>http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xptr-20000607
>and I have found some discrepancies.
>
>
>* Section 5.4.3 (Additional Range-Related Functions)
>Functions 'start-point' and 'end-point' are declared with
>argument 'point':
>point start-point(point) resp. point end-point(point)
>
>but below the definitions the following text appears:
>'For each location x in the argument location-set, ...'.
> From the context it seems, that they should be
>declared:
>point start-point(location-set) resp. point end-point(location-set)
>
>Is it right?
>
>
>* Missing right parenthesis in section 5.4.6, last example:
>xpointer(id('list37')/item[1]/range-to(following-sibling(item)[2])
>
>Best regards
>Jirka Jirat
>
>--
>Jiri Jirat
>Zvon.org
>jiratj@idoox.com

--
Eve Maler                                          +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center    eve.maler @ east.sun.com
Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2000 11:00:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:41 GMT