Philipp Hoschka wrote: > > Eric, > > Could you explain in a bit more detail how you think this would work ? > As far as I understand, this would require one XSLT transformation > per language that states which attributes should be converted into > Xlinks. The schema-based solution only requires one Schema with > subtype-definitions that can be reused in many languages. You can design a single XSLT transformation working with different namespaces (but you have to know them in advance). Isn't it the same with XML Schema ? Wouldn't you have to define a schema for each namespace --even if you can "ref" attributes in a common one ? > But I guess it's better to postpone a discussion until the note > is actually public - Daniel, any idea when this will be ? > Maybe you can already make the draft that you have today public, and > then > potentially update it based on discussions. I think you're right, since I miss an important piece of the puzzle ! Thanks Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist Dyomedea http://dyomedea.com http://xmlfr.org http://4xt.org http://ducotede.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Thursday, 21 September 2000 06:22:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:41 GMT