W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > January to March 2000

minor comments for WD-xlink-20000221

From: Susan Lesch <susan@textet.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 03:29:22 -0800
Message-Id: <v04210100b4dd69267eb3@[24.25.222.186]>
To: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Cc: w3t-comm@w3.org
Here are a few comments on your XLink last call Working Draft [1] 
"work in progress."

In 2. par. 5, "don't" could read "do not". ("Don't" is perhaps a bit 
colloquial for a formal spec.)

In 1. par. 4 list item 5, "stylesheets" could read "style sheets".

"XLink-namespace" appears six times. I don't know if that should be 
hyphenated (as is) or be two words.

"Namespaces Recommendation [XNAME]" appears five times. I'm not 
certain if that should read "namespaces Recommendation [XNAME]" 
(normal capitalization as far as I know), "Namespaces in XML 
Recommendation [XNAME]" (the title), or if it is correct as is.

Some of the examples use registered domains (me.com, somewhere.org, 
and an.org). You could consider the safer IANA-registered 
example.com, example.net, and example.org which are reserved for 
examples. (See RFC 2606 section 3 at 
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt.)

In 3.4 par. 3, "must be receive" could read "must receive".

In 3.5 par. 1, "locator" could read "locator-".

Reference:
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xlink-20000221/

Best wishes,
-- 
Susan Lesch
susan@textet.com
Received on Saturday, 26 February 2000 06:29:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:40 GMT