W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > January to March 2000

RE: comments on 21-February-2000 XLink WD

From: Eve L. Maler <elm@east.sun.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:31:36 -0500
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000225133035.00b13a20@abnaki.East.Sun.Com>
To: "DuCharme, Robert" <DuCharmR@moodys.com>
Cc: "'Eve L. Maler'" <elm@east.sun.com>, "'www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org>
At 01:19 PM 2/25/00 -0500, DuCharme, Robert wrote:
> >I believe we've also now removed all uses of XLink as a noun.
>
>It's still in the second paragraph of 3.1, which is the only place I ever
>saw it.

Oops, I'll fix.

> >So it's "make recognizable."  Perhaps the heavy noun phrase at the end
> >could be moved up: "Document creators can use the XLink global attributes
> >to make recognizable as XLink elements the elements in their own namespace,
> >or even in a namespace they don't control."  What do you think?
>
>That looks better, although I should have noticed "recognizable" originally.

Maybe I'll play with it some more.  They're both awkward.

>Again, I apologize for not paying closer attention when checking last
>month's notes against this month's draft.

No problem at all -- it's nice to know we've been responding to the right 
sorts of issues when we do the revs.

         Eve
--
Eve Maler            Sun Microsystems
elm @ east.sun.com    +1 781 442 3190
Received on Friday, 25 February 2000 13:30:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:40 GMT