W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Issue: inconsistency of S production and treatment of line

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:32:54 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200210161445.KAA07273@mail2.reutershealth.com>
To: alewis@tibco.com (Amelia A Lewis)
Cc: jcowan@reutershealth.com (John Cowan), www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org

Amelia A Lewis scripsit:

> Then the same objection applies to #x85 and #x2028.  If there is good
> reason to have #xD in S, then those reasons are also good enough to have
> #x85 and #x2028.

The *only* reason to have #xD in S is backward compatibility.  No such
reason exists for #x85 and #x2028.

There is / One art                      John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
No more / No less                       http://www.reutershealth.com
To do / All things                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
With art- / Lessness                     -- Piet Hein
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 10:34:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:13:20 UTC