On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 10:17, John Cowan wrote: > Amelia A Lewis scripsit: > > For consistency, redefine S to > > remove #xD, which cannot appear after line ending normalization. > > As noted, it is possible by sufficient entity abuse to get a #xD character > into the replacement text of a parameter entity, so we do not plan to change > S even though any *physical* #xD character will be normalized away by 2.11. Then the same objection applies to #x85 and #x2028. If there is good reason to have #xD in S, then those reasons are also good enough to have #x85 and #x2028. Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.comReceived on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 10:22:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 29 October 2007 16:58:05 GMT