W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > February 2003

Re: Serving static responses

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:50:42 -0500
To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>, stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie
Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
Message-Id: <200302041350.42606.reagle@w3.org>

On Tuesday 04 February 2003 12:52, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> As a minimum RequestID becomes optional. Otherwise RequestID is in the
> context that is signed and so the response has to be dynamic - which is
> not suprising since that it the whole point of RequestID

Do those with better memory remember why we made it required in the first 
place? Was it satisfying some requirement with respect to security or 
correspondence within the asynchronous/multi-stage query/response?
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 13:50:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:40 UTC