W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > August 2003

RE: Remaining issues

From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 07:19:31 -0700
Message-ID: <2A1D4C86842EE14CA9BC80474919782E0D2384@mou1wnexm02.verisign.com>
To: "Www-Xkms (E-mail)" <www-xkms@w3.org>
I took a look at this. It seems to make sense to me. A NCName production is
lexicaly the 'local' part of a URI - i.e. after the # mark.
 
This seems better than anyURI, it would mean that references to requests and
responses would no longer require the # mark.
 
On the other hand this would break all the examples (not a real issue) and
any code. On the other hand the changes to the existing code would be pretty
simple.
 
Do we want to do this or not?

  Chopra - 11     

OriginalRequestId (RequestAbstractType), RespondID (PendingRequest) ,
RequestId (ResultType) should be of type "xsd:NCName" as they are referring
to "xsd:ID" type elements in other XML docs. 
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2003 10:19:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:30:58 GMT