W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > September 2002

FW: Issue 20 part 2

From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:34:29 -0700
Message-ID: <2F3EC696EAEED311BB2D009027C3F4F40E6B2484@vhqpostal.verisign.com>
To: www-xkms@w3.org
The other part of issue 20 relates to the separation of locate / validate
essentially it is suggested that we differentiate between locate and
validate keybindings.

IU suggest that we do this but keep the name for a validate response as
keybinding to avoid interference with the registration options.

We could choose some other name for the element like
'NonValidatedKeybinding' or such.

 

<!-- KeyBinding -->
<element name="LocateKeyBinding" type="xkms:LocateKeyBindingType"/>
<complexType name="LocateKeyBindingType">
<complexContent>
<extension base="xkms:KeyBindingAbstractType">
<sequence>
<element ref="xkms:ValidityInterval" minOccurs="0"/>
</sequence>
</extension>
</complexContent>
</complexType>
<!-- /KeyBinding -->

<!-- KeyBinding -->
<element name="KeyBinding" type="xkms:KeyBindingType"/>
<complexType name="KeyBindingType">
<complexContent>
<extension base="xkms:KeyBindingAbstractType">
<sequence>
<element ref="xkms:Status" minOccurs="0"/>
<element ref="xkms:ValidityInterval" minOccurs="0"/>
</sequence>
</extension>
</complexContent>
</complexType>
<!-- /KeyBinding -->
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2002 17:32:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:17 GMT