W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > January 2002

RE: requirements review/plan

From: Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 21:42:42 -0800
To: <www-xkms@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NABBJDOPDKGCDCNBNEDOGEEBGKAA.ksankar@cisco.com>
Hi,

	Some minor points.

1)	2.1 ... Every client must support *at least* one of *these* mechanisms.
2)	Add : 13. The specification shall explicitly state the visibility
requirements (of elements), if any, for cases like encryption.
3)	It would be better to define "assertion" in the context of this
requirement set. For example 3.3. talks about assertions, while 2.7 says
some assertions are out of scope. It would be precise if we could add a
requirement in Section 3.1 The specification shall define ... assertion, ...
assertion, ...

cheers
Received on Friday, 18 January 2002 02:40:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:38 UTC