W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms-ws@w3.org > November 2001

Re: XKMS 2.0 base working draft

From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:04:19 +0000
Message-ID: <3BFBECA3.28D57F96@baltimore.ie>
To: Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>
CC: www-xkms-ws@w3c.org

Wouldn't ws-security create a referencing/timing problem for us?

Stephen.

Krishna Sankar wrote:
> 
> phb,
> 
>  |
>  | 5) How do we address message signing? Profile ws-security? Inline
>  | signatures?
>  |
> 
>         ws-security is still emerging and general. I think we would need to have a
> section customizing some parts of it similar to the one we wrote for SAML.
> Hopefully this section would become more and more thinner as the
> ws-security/SOAP security evolves. On a related note ETSI has a good
> document adding stuff to XML Signature like key information, time stamping
> authority et al which we might want to look at.
> 
>         Another quick question : What do we do for encryption ? Again WS-Security ?
> 
> cheers and have a happy thanksgiving

-- 
____________________________________________________________
Stephen Farrell         				   
Baltimore Technologies,   tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716
39 Parkgate Street,                     fax: +353 1 881 7000
Dublin 8.                mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie
Ireland                             http://www.baltimore.com
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 13:04:12 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 13:51:41 EDT