W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws@w3.org > November 2004

RE: WS-Addressing

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 12:52:37 -0000
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709DDB8@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <Joseph.Waller@syntegra.com>, <www-ws@w3.org>

Hi Joseph!

as discussed, there is now a W3C Web Services Addressing WG
which is using the WS-Addressing member submission as primary

1) the WG have decided to use schema to describe the structures, 
   though it is worth noting that the binding Addressing in WSDL
   1.1 will probably be abstract and unlikely to result in 
   application header code being generated by existing tools. 

2) I'll review the latest WG drafts and raise an issue for the WG
   to discuss.


Paul Downey
Web Services Integration
BT Exact

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of joseph.waller@syntegra.com
Sent: 26 November 2004 10:53
To: www-ws@w3.org
Subject: WS-Addressing

I would like to make a couple of comments on the:
Web Services Addressing (WS-Addressing)
W3C Member Submission 10 August 2004
1)       It is unfortunate that WS-Addressing does not provide a facility for describing it's headers in a Schema that can be referenced from a WSDL. This would allow non WS-A but WSDL compliant toolsets to become compliant easily.
2)       The speicifcation refers to...
"The SOAP 1.1 fault is less expressive and map only [Subcode] and [Reason]. These the properties bind to a SOAP 1.1 fault as follows:"
            But only mentions the faultcode and faultstring. It does not mention detail (or fault actor) elements.
Kind regards,
Joseph Waller |Spine Central Design Team |National Spine |BT |T: +44 (0)113-306-5677 |M: +44 (0)7793-841-932 |E: joseph.waller@syntegra.com |W:www.bt.com/consulting |


This email may contain information which is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please notify the sender immediately and delete it without reading, copying, storing, forwarding or disclosing its contents to any other person
Thank you

Check us out at http://www.bt.com/consulting

Received on Friday, 26 November 2004 12:51:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:11 UTC