W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws@w3.org > November 2004


From: <joseph.waller@syntegra.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:52:34 -0000
Message-Id: <2FCB3C250BD41C4FBEE0F2767EFBE6F6997697@ls-exchange-11.uk.intra.syntegra.com>
To: <www-ws@w3.org>
I would like to make a couple of comments on the:
Web Services Addressing (WS-Addressing)
W3C Member Submission 10 August 2004
1)       It is unfortunate that WS-Addressing does not provide a facility for
describing it's headers in a Schema that can be referenced from a WSDL. This
would allow non WS-A but WSDL compliant toolsets to become compliant easily.
2)       The speicifcation refers to...
"The SOAP 1.1 fault is less expressive and map only [Subcode] and [Reason].
These the properties bind to a SOAP 1.1 fault as follows:"
            But only mentions the faultcode and faultstring. It does not
mention detail (or fault actor) elements.
Kind regards,
Joseph Waller |Spine Central Design Team |National Spine |BT |T: +44
(0)113-306-5677 |M: +44 (0)7793-841-932 |E: joseph.waller@syntegra.com
|W:www.bt.com/consulting |


This email may contain information which is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please notify the sender immediately and delete it without reading, copying, storing, forwarding or disclosing its contents to any other person
Thank you

Check us out at http://www.bt.com/consulting

Received on Friday, 26 November 2004 10:57:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:11 UTC