W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws@w3.org > October 2002

RE: DAML-S feedback

From: David Hurst <dhurst@lisletech.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:09:38 -0500
To: <www-ws@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7813F04E34A6D6119A4D0060B0A3897E0137C9@arcturus.lisletech.com>

Hello!

Is the DAML-S 0.7 draft publicly available anywhere?  I notice that the
projected Sept. 30th release is still not up on the DAML-S web site, so I
was wondering if it would be possible to get a preview of it.

thanx
--DaveH		"Be Excellent to each other!"
David Hurst
Lisle Technology Partners         tel:630.353.1900 x16
650 Warrenville Road, suite 100   mailto:dhurst@lisletech.com
Lisle, Illinois, 60532            http://www.lisletech.com/



> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
> Massimo Paolucci
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:05 AM
> To: Mohamed Keshk
> Cc: www-ws@w3.org
> Subject: Re: DAML-S feedback
>
>
>
> Thanks Mohamed for your comments.  You are right on the first and the
> third point, the domain of UNSPSCcode and
> UNSPSCclassification should be Product
> not CompositeProcess and the Congo should refer to TemporalInstancnce
> instead of Time.
>
> I think you are right on the second point also,  but I leave David
> Martin the final call.
>
>
> --- Massimo
>
>  > Hi,
>  >   I went over DAML-S 0.7 draft version and found these
>  > comments as feedback:
>  >
>  > 1 - In "ProfileHierarchy.daml" the following is
>  > declared:
>  >
>  >   <daml:Class rdf:ID="Product">
>  >     <daml:comment>
>  >       Product is the top level of a Product ontology
>  >       for now it records the product classification in
>  > UNSPSC
>  >     </daml:comment>
>  >   </daml:Class>
>  >
>  >
>  >   <daml:DataProperty rdf:ID="UNSPSCcode">
>  >     <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#CompositeProcess"/>
>  >     <!-- SHOULD BE "Product" ??? -->
>  >     <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&xsd;#String"/>
>  >   </daml:DataProperty>
>  >
>  >   <daml:DataProperty rdf:ID="UNSPSCclassification">
>  >     <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#CompositeProcess"/>
>  >     <!-- SHOULD BE "Product" ??? -->
>  >     <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&xsd;#String"/>
>  >   </daml:DataProperty>
>  >
>  >
>  > and I belive the domain in both cases should be
>  > "#Product" not "#CompositeProcess", because it makes
>  > more sense and at the same time "CompositeProcess"
>  > class is not defined in the same ontology.
>  >
>  >
>  > 2 - In "Grounding.daml" the following is declared:
>  >
>  > <daml:UniqueProperty rdf:ID="damlsProcess">
>  >   <rdfs:comment>
>  >     The atomic process to which this grounding
>  > applies.
>  >   </rdfs:comment>
>  >   <rdfs:domain
>  > rdf:resource="#WsdlAtomicProcessGrounding"/>
>  >   <rdfs:range
>  > rdf:resource="&process;#AtomicProcessPowerSet"/>
>  > </daml:UniqueProperty>
>  >
>  >
>  > "AtomicProcessPowerSet" class is not defined in
>  > process ontology
>  > but "AtomicProcessClass" class is the one defined.
>  > So, they should be switched.
>  >
>  >
>  > 3 - In "CongoProfile.daml" the following is declared:
>  >
>  > <profile:input>
>  >   <profile:ParameterDescription
>  > rdf:ID="CreditCardExpirationDate">
>  >     <profile:parameterName>
>  >       creditCardExpirationDate
>  >     </profile:parameterName>
>  >     <profile:restrictedTo rdf:resource="&time;#Time"/>
>  >     <profile:refersTo rdf:resource =
>  >         "&congoProcess;#creditCardExpirationDate"/>
>  >   </profile:ParameterDescription>
>  > </profile:input>
>  >
>  >
>  > there is no such class "Time" in time ontology, should
>  > be changed to
>  > "TemporalEntity"?. I'm not sure what should it be.
>  >
>  > Please correct me if I'm missing something.
>  >
>  > Thank you.
>  >
>  > Mohamed Keshk
>  >
>  >
>  > __________________________________________________
>  > Do you Yahoo!?
>  > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
>  > http://faith.yahoo.com
>  >
>
Received on Friday, 11 October 2002 12:13:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:40 GMT