W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws@w3.org > July 2001

Re: WSDL import questions

From: Simon Fell <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 09:30:50 -0700
To: www-ws@w3.org
Message-ID: <7b81kt0427dv28tuh0fk32e1nugl9f1s33@4ax.com>
You might want to checkout a similar thread from the WSDL list, start
with http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wsdl/message/112

Cheers
Simon
www.pocketsoap.com


On Mon, 2 Jul 2001 17:03:20 +0100 , in soap you wrote:

>Anyone able to shed some light on the wsdl import statement as described in
>http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315
><http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315>  ?
> 
>In section 2.1.2 example 2 the import statement within file
>"stockquote.wsdl" appears to import a <schema> element (in "stockquote.xsd")
>as the direct child of a <definitions>, whereas the WSDL grammar mandates
>that the <schema> element should be contained within a <types> element...
> 
>Further on the import statement within file "stockquoteservice.wsdl" appears
>to import a <definitions> element as the direct child of an enclosing
><definitions> - again this appears to be contrary to the grammar as laid out
>in 2.1.
> 
>Is there some implied rules associated with a import statement (e.g. if the
>importee is a schema an enclosing <types> element may be inferred). If so
>maybe the authors could make the rules clear in the next rev. of the spec.
> 
>Or maybe its just that I'm missing something :-(
> 
>        Simon
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 2 July 2001 12:32:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:38 GMT