Anyone able to shed some light on the wsdl import statement as described in http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315 <http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315> ? In section 2.1.2 example 2 the import statement within file "stockquote.wsdl" appears to import a <schema> element (in "stockquote.xsd") as the direct child of a <definitions>, whereas the WSDL grammar mandates that the <schema> element should be contained within a <types> element... Further on the import statement within file "stockquoteservice.wsdl" appears to import a <definitions> element as the direct child of an enclosing <definitions> - again this appears to be contrary to the grammar as laid out in 2.1. Is there some implied rules associated with a import statement (e.g. if the importee is a schema an enclosing <types> element may be inferred). If so maybe the authors could make the rules clear in the next rev. of the spec. Or maybe its just that I'm missing something :-( SimonReceived on Monday, 2 July 2001 12:04:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:38 GMT