W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Final WSDL 2.0 document tweaks

From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:54:52 -0400
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jonathan@wso2.com>
Cc: "'WS-Description WG'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF5C0598CC.777818CE-ON85257302.007286E6-85257302.0072E376@ca.ibm.com>
+1

Arthur Ryman, PhD, AoT, DE
Process and Portfolio Management, Rational Division

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-3831 (T/L: 318-8867)
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca



"Jonathan Marsh" <jonathan@wso2.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
06/20/2007 06:01 PM

To
"'WS-Description WG'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
cc

Subject
Final WSDL 2.0 document tweaks






The call for review of the WSDL 2.0 documents ends today!  If you haven?t 
yet voted, get your AC rep on the phone right away!
 
In looking at the issues raised on this list during the PR period, I 
propose we resolve them as follows.  Since these are fairly trivial 
matters, I don?t think we need a telcon for them if nobody objects to my 
proposed resolutions.
 
1) Jacek proposed a clarification at [1].  This looks like a reasonable 
editorial clarification, and I propose we accept his proposed resolution 
and incorporate it into the Rec draft.
 
2) Jacek also asks for some RDDL/RDF for our non-namespace URIs at [2].  I 
believe Philippe has prepared simple RDDL documents for these URIs per W3C 
policy, but it?s not clear to me what RDF should accompany the RDDL, nor 
who would write it.  Because it?s easy to add RDF links to the RDDLs I 
propose add this item to bugzilla for the future WS Core WG to address as 
an errata (although since it?s not an issue against the Rec so it?s really 
more of a work item.)
 
3) Bug 4590 [3] can be closed, as it's been fixed editorially.
 
4) Bug 4563 [4] looks like a quibble over wording ? the behavior doesn?t 
seem to be in question.  I think it is harmless to leave this one open as 
a potential errata for the future WS Core WG. 
 
So, if nobody disagrees with these resolutions by the end of business this 
week, I?ll ask the editors and Philippe to act accordingly and we should 
be able to see a Recommendation publication before our charter expires 
next week.
 
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007May/0042.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007May/0044.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4590
[4] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4563
 
 
Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - 
http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 
Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 20:55:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:47 GMT