W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2007

RE: Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only define faults

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:52:25 -0800
To: "'Ramkumar Menon'" <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <037601c75164$babc71c0$3501a8c0@DELLICIOUS>
Thank you for the comment.  The Working Group this issue as a CR152 [1].


While we don't see much utility in defining a Binding Component for an
Interface that defines only faults, writing such an assertion is a bit
complicated to develop, since it has to handle interfaceless Bindings as
well.  Because we're trying to finish the spec shortly, adding such an
assertion was judged as low value at this point.  The WG thus decided to
close with no action.


Unless you let us know otherwise within 2 weeks, we will assume you agree
with the resolution of this issue.


[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR152 


Jonathan Marsh -  <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com



From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Ramkumar Menon
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 8:14 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only define faults


Hi Gurus,


I assume that it does not make sense, and is an error to define a Binding
component for an Interface Component that defines only Faults. Does this
call for a new assertion ?





Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!

-Ramkumar Menon
A typical Macroprocessor 
Received on Friday, 16 February 2007 00:59:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:03 UTC