W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2007

CR114: Discrepancy between initial proposal and resolution (apparently)

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:15:33 +0100
To: WSD Public <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-id: <45CC9E25.7050200@crf.canon.fr>

I'd like to reopen CR144.

Youenn's initial request was to add the following mappings:
a. robust-in-only -> SOAP request-optional response (SOAP 1.2 Second 
Edition)
b. in-only -> SOAP 1-way (Working Draft)

It seems the WG decided instead:
c. robust-in-only -> SOAP request-response (SOAP 1.2 Initial Edition)
d. in-only -> SOAP request-response (SOAP 1.2 Initial Edition)

This is quite a substantial difference.

a+b seems to make more sense in the long run, but cannot be implemented 
now (WD + SE).

c+d seems like an interim, moderately attractive solution.

(Am I missing something obvious?)

So my question is: do we really want to implement c+d now or should we 
proceed with no-action instead?

JJ.
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 16:16:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:46 GMT