Re: Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only define faults

Heyo,

--On February 6, 2007 8:13:36 PM -0800 Ramkumar Menon 
<ramkumar.menon@gmail.com> wrote:
> I assume that it does not make sense, and is an error to define a Binding
> component for an Interface Component that defines only Faults. Does this
> call for a new assertion ?

I can see a use case, for a "mix-in" interface.  Perhaps that's stretching 
a point.  In any event, while it may seem pointless, I don't see that it is 
an error.

Amy!
-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Senior Architect
TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com