W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > April 2007

RE: Proposal to Include whttp:code to the output of the binding operation

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:22:18 -0700
To: "'keith chapman'" <keithgchapman@gmail.com>, "'www-ws-desc'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <010401c785f5$dbb173b0$93145b10$@com>
Specifically, you'd like to see a  way to describe the "201 Created" and
"304 Not Modified" responses of PUT and POST?  FTR, there's nothing that
prevents those codes from being used with and in-out mep - though those
values are constrained when using the in-only and robust-in-only meps [2].


So, while adding whttp:code to binding operations might help in generating
server-side stubs, does it provide any information useful to the client?


[1] http://ietfreport.isoc.org/all-ids/draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-14.txt



Jonathan Marsh -  <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com


From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of keith chapman
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 11:01 PM
To: www-ws-desc
Subject: Proposal to Include whttp:code to the output of the binding


Hi all,

I wonder whteher its too late, but I think its import that it makes its way
into the spec. I was playing around with APP trying to write a WSDL for it
(Use it as a WSDL 2.0 demo). During this I came across a limitation which I
guess WSDL 2.0 should address. The HTTPBinding allows a user to set a HTTP
code on a fault but it does not allow a user to specify a http code on a
response. This is a trick that we missed.

I would like to propose the inclusion of whttp:code property to the output
of the binding operation. This will be critical for the HTTPBinding to be


Keith Chapman
WSO2 Inc.
Oxygen for Web Services Developers.
Received on Monday, 23 April 2007 22:22:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:04 UTC