W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > April 2007

RE: Bug 4431 - Proposed Edit Needs Review

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:57:25 -0700
To: "'Arthur Ryman'" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <059b01c78122$3d6e79f0$b84b6dd0$@com>
Nit I know, but it still reads a little redundant, or even circular, with
your proposal:

 

Two component instances of the same type are considered equivalent if, for
each

property of the first component, there is a corresponding property with an

equivalent value, as defined in the following sentence, on the second

component, and vice versa.

 

Instances of properties of the same type are considered equivalent if their

values are equivalent.

 

Would it read better as:

 

Two component instances of the same type are considered equivalent if, for
each

property of the first component, there is an equivalent property on the
second

component, and vice versa.

 

Instances of properties are considered equivalent if they have the same type
and their

values are equivalent.

 

?

 

Jonathan Marsh -  <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com

 

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 3:06 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Bug 4431 - Proposed Edit Needs Review

 


Please review my proposal [1] 

[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4431 

Arthur Ryman, PhD, AoT, DE
Process and Portfolio Management, Rational Division

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-3831 (T/L: 318-8867)
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 19:03:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:46 GMT