W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2006

RE: Suggested removal of 2 assertions

From: Tom Jordahl <tjordahl@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:24:47 -0800
Message-ID: <AD0C8E6047016B48A53660CD4888CE39019A4A1E@namail4.corp.adobe.com>
To: "Lawrence Mandel" <lmandel@ca.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Isn't it reasonable to include assertions explicitly even though they
may be enforced by Schema validation?

 

Doesn't this make it easier for a user of the spec to understand the
requirements?

 

--

Tom Jordahl

Adobe ColdFusion Team

________________________________

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Lawrence Mandel
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 2:44 AM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Suggested removal of 2 assertions

 


I'd like to request that the following 2 assertions be removed from the
WSDL 2.0 spec. as they are all handled by the WSDL 2.0 schema and schema
validation. 

Endpoint-0065 

For each Endpoint component in the endpoints property of a Service
component, the name property MUST be unique.



InterfaceFault-0032 

For each Interface Fault component in the interface faults property of
an Interface component, the name property must be unique.



Thanks, 

Lawrence Mandel

Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814   Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
lmandel@ca.ibm.com
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2006 16:25:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:42 GMT