RE: Requested enhancement to assertion coverage report

Very nice. Thanks!

Lawrence Mandel

Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814   Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
lmandel@ca.ibm.com



"Jonathan Marsh" <jonathan@wso2.com> 
11/28/2006 12:09 AM

To
Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
cc

Subject
RE: Requested enhancement to assertion coverage report






Did 1 as well ? if there are assertions in the TestMetadata not in the 
report, it will give a warning right at the front, naming each mysterious 
assertion.  There are a couple already flagged to look at?
 
Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - 
http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On 
Behalf Of Lawrence Mandel
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 11:36 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Requested enhancement to assertion coverage report
 

Jonathan, 

First of all, nice work on the reports. 

I have a couple requests, assuming you can find the time. :) 

1. Given that you found a couple tests that referenced invalid assertion 
IDs, I'd like to request that a section be added to the assertion report 
that shows the tests that are referencing invalid assertion IDs. I think 
this will be useful as assertions are removed from the spec and when the 
assertions are renumbered. 

2. It would also be nice to know (this really is only a nice to have item 
on the importance scale) the coverage of part 1 and part 2 of the spec. 
I'd like to request that the numbers be included in the totals summary. 
For example, 

98/228 assertions (60/157 component, 20/50 document, 18/18 exchange, 0/3 
message). 80/106 for part 1, 18/122 for part 2. 

Thanks, 

Lawrence Mandel

Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814   Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
lmandel@ca.ibm.com