Re: 2.1.6 UC0028 Sync/Async Operations [IS] --> Web Service Description Usage Scenarios

Hi All,
One more additional thought - I was wondering if it wd it be useful to
capture in some form, the following.

a) The mapping between the features/functionality that WSDL 2.0 offers and
the use-cases that these features/functionality address.
b) In case any of the use-cases havent been addressed, a small note
indicating the motivation for not choosing to do so within the current time
frame + the plans looking ahead.
I am referring to the use-cases document [
http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-desc-usecases<http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-desc-usecases/#N10244>
]

rgds,
Menon

On 3/21/06, Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Apologies for posting this one again, but would be great if some one cd
> enlighten me of any updates on this issue I had raised earlier.
> re-wording the earlier question:-
> "Any plans to "explicitly" capture synchronicity of operations within the
> abstract WSDL for the 2.0 version?" -
> rgds,
> Menon
>
>
> On 2/27/06, Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Any plans to capture synchronicity of operations within the abstract
> > WSDL for the 2.0 version? [http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-desc-usecases/#N10244
> > ]
> >  -Menon
> > --
> > Shift to the left, shift to the right!
> > Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!
> >
> > -Ramkumar Menon
> > A typical Macroprocessor
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Shift to the left, shift to the right!
> Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!
>
> -Ramkumar Menon
> A typical Macroprocessor
>



--
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!

-Ramkumar Menon
A typical Macroprocessor