W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2006

Re: 2.1.6 UC0028 Sync/Async Operations [IS] --> Web Service Description Usage Scenarios

From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:41:23 -0500
To: "Ramkumar Menon" <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060321104123.f9427c18.alewis@tibco.com>

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:44:39 +0530
"Ramkumar Menon" <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com> wrote:

>Apologies for posting this one again, but would be great if some one cd
>enlighten me of any updates on this issue I had raised earlier.
>re-wording the earlier question:-
>"Any plans to "explicitly" capture synchronicity of operations within
>the abstract WSDL for the 2.0 version?" -

Explicitly, no.  The introduction to MEPs in part two states, I believe
quite clearly, what is covered by a MEP, and "synchronicity" is clearly
out of scope.

If someone wishes to add an extension to indicate "synchronicity", they
are free to do so.

Amy!
-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Senior Architect
TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2006 15:41:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:39 GMT