- From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:41:23 -0500
- To: "Ramkumar Menon" <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:44:39 +0530 "Ramkumar Menon" <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com> wrote: >Apologies for posting this one again, but would be great if some one cd >enlighten me of any updates on this issue I had raised earlier. >re-wording the earlier question:- >"Any plans to "explicitly" capture synchronicity of operations within >the abstract WSDL for the 2.0 version?" - Explicitly, no. The introduction to MEPs in part two states, I believe quite clearly, what is covered by a MEP, and "synchronicity" is clearly out of scope. If someone wishes to add an extension to indicate "synchronicity", they are free to do so. Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Senior Architect TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2006 15:41:37 UTC