W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2006

Re: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 11:16:38 +0200
To: "John Kaputin (gmail)" <jakaputin@gmail.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, John Kaputin <KAPUTIN@uk.ibm.com>, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Message-Id: <1149844598.32737.24.camel@localhost>

John, yes, that still needs clarification. 

My take would be like this:  

 1) BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} need not be copied
from Binding {http transfer coding default}, the defaulting rules for
{http transfer coding} should reach there themselves; however if both
defaults are present, the operation default applies to components within
this operation.
 2) BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} should not apply to
BindingFaultReference components (as per my previous email), and neither
should it apply to BindingFault components (because they are not in
 3) Binding {http transfer coding default} does not apply to Interface*
components, it should apply to BindingFault and BindingMessageReference

If any of that disagrees with the current spec, I think the spec should
be fixed. 8-)

>From this, below I give concrete comments to your statements. 

On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 01:22 +0100, John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
> It's clear that BindingMessageReference {http transfer coding}
> defaults to BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} as stated.

BindingMessageReference {http transfer coding} should default to
BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} or, if that is not
present, to Binding {http transfer coding default}.

> But does BindingFault {http transfer coding} also default to
> BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} as stated in this
> section and if so, to which operation?  I am wondering if BindingFault
> should default to Binding {http transfer coding default} instead.

BindingFault {http transfer coding} only defaults to Binding {http
transfer coding default}.

> Is there any intended relationship between Binding {http transfer
> coding default} and BindingOperation {http transfer coding default}? 

I'd say no such relationship is necessary, apart from that hidden in how
BindingMessageReference {http transfer coding} property is defaulted.

Hope it's not too controversial (or confusing),

Received on Friday, 9 June 2006 09:16:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:59 UTC