W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2006

Re: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding

From: John Kaputin (gmail) <jakaputin@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 18:16:21 +0100
Message-ID: <4c2ae8f80606091016o5ddfd8b6vf46fdbc679abb2a5@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, "John Kaputin" <KAPUTIN@uk.ibm.com>, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Thanks Jacek. This is clear and it makes sense. When the Editors copy of
Part 2 is updated to reflect this I'll update the Woden code to match.

regards,
John Kaputin.

On 6/9/06, Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org> wrote:
>
> John, yes, that still needs clarification.
>
> My take would be like this:
>
> 1) BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} need not be copied
> from Binding {http transfer coding default}, the defaulting rules for
> {http transfer coding} should reach there themselves; however if both
> defaults are present, the operation default applies to components within
> this operation.
> 2) BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} should not apply to
> BindingFaultReference components (as per my previous email), and neither
> should it apply to BindingFault components (because they are not in
> scope).
> 3) Binding {http transfer coding default} does not apply to Interface*
> components, it should apply to BindingFault and BindingMessageReference
> components.
>
> If any of that disagrees with the current spec, I think the spec should
> be fixed. 8-)
>
> >From this, below I give concrete comments to your statements.
>
>
> On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 01:22 +0100, John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
> > It's clear that BindingMessageReference {http transfer coding}
> > defaults to BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} as stated.
>
> BindingMessageReference {http transfer coding} should default to
> BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} or, if that is not
> present, to Binding {http transfer coding default}.
>
> > But does BindingFault {http transfer coding} also default to
> > BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} as stated in this
> > section and if so, to which operation?  I am wondering if BindingFault
> > should default to Binding {http transfer coding default} instead.
>
> BindingFault {http transfer coding} only defaults to Binding {http
> transfer coding default}.
>
> > Is there any intended relationship between Binding {http transfer
> > coding default} and BindingOperation {http transfer coding default}?
>
> I'd say no such relationship is necessary, apart from that hidden in how
> BindingMessageReference {http transfer coding} property is defaulted.
>
> Hope it's not too controversial (or confusing),
>
> Jacek
>
>
Received on Friday, 9 June 2006 17:16:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:40 GMT