Thanks Jacek. This is clear and it makes sense. When the Editors copy of Part 2 is updated to reflect this I'll update the Woden code to match. regards, John Kaputin. On 6/9/06, Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org> wrote: > > John, yes, that still needs clarification. > > My take would be like this: > > 1) BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} need not be copied > from Binding {http transfer coding default}, the defaulting rules for > {http transfer coding} should reach there themselves; however if both > defaults are present, the operation default applies to components within > this operation. > 2) BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} should not apply to > BindingFaultReference components (as per my previous email), and neither > should it apply to BindingFault components (because they are not in > scope). > 3) Binding {http transfer coding default} does not apply to Interface* > components, it should apply to BindingFault and BindingMessageReference > components. > > If any of that disagrees with the current spec, I think the spec should > be fixed. 8-) > > >From this, below I give concrete comments to your statements. > > > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 01:22 +0100, John Kaputin (gmail) wrote: > > It's clear that BindingMessageReference {http transfer coding} > > defaults to BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} as stated. > > BindingMessageReference {http transfer coding} should default to > BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} or, if that is not > present, to Binding {http transfer coding default}. > > > But does BindingFault {http transfer coding} also default to > > BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} as stated in this > > section and if so, to which operation? I am wondering if BindingFault > > should default to Binding {http transfer coding default} instead. > > BindingFault {http transfer coding} only defaults to Binding {http > transfer coding default}. > > > Is there any intended relationship between Binding {http transfer > > coding default} and BindingOperation {http transfer coding default}? > > I'd say no such relationship is necessary, apart from that hidden in how > BindingMessageReference {http transfer coding} property is defaulted. > > Hope it's not too controversial (or confusing), > > Jacek > >Received on Friday, 9 June 2006 17:16:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 June 2006 17:16:32 GMT