W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2006

Re: WSDL Import with just a location attribute

From: Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:07:32 -0700
Message-ID: <22bb8a4e0607121707u1f7a8067q9b03b0214cf323bb@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Rogers, Tony" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org

Hi Tony,
Thanks for your response. Apologies for not being clear - I am
referring to "importing" of "documents" that are in a different target
namespace, which aren't covered by semantics of include.

rgds,
Ram



On 7/12/06, Rogers, Tony <Tony.Rogers@ca.com> wrote:
> Why do you want to import the document? What does this achieve that you
> can't get from include?
>
> Tony Rogers
> tony.rogers@ca.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Ramkumar Menon
> Sent: Thursday, 13 July 2006 8:49
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: WSDL Import with just a location attribute
>
>
> Hi Gurus,
> What is fundamentally wrong with an import of a document, rather than a
> foreign namespace, into a WSDL Document ?
> If I translate my thoughts into syntax,
> why is
> <wsdl:import
> location="http://www.twinktwinklilstar.com/wsdls/star.wsdl"/>
> so unholy ?
>
> Why not accept this variant ["of course", in addition to the existing
> version] as a valid wsdl import ? If not, what's the strong reason
> against this?
>
> One more question - why is targetNamespace attribute for WSDL 2.0
> documents mandatory ? Is it a WS-I issue ?
>
>
> rgds,
> Ram
> --
> Shift to the left, shift to the right!
> Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!
>
> -Ramkumar Menon
>  A typical Macroprocessor
>
>
>


-- 
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!

-Ramkumar Menon
 A typical Macroprocessor
Received on Thursday, 13 July 2006 00:07:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:41 GMT