W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2006

RE: WSDL Import with just a location attribute

From: Rogers, Tony <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:44:22 +1000
Message-ID: <BEE2BD647C052D4FA59B42F5E2D946B326AF35@AUSYMS12.ca.com>
To: "Ramkumar Menon" <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Why do you want to import the document? What does this achieve that you
can't get from include?

Tony Rogers
tony.rogers@ca.com

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Ramkumar Menon
Sent: Thursday, 13 July 2006 8:49
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: WSDL Import with just a location attribute


Hi Gurus,
What is fundamentally wrong with an import of a document, rather than a
foreign namespace, into a WSDL Document ?
If I translate my thoughts into syntax,
why is
<wsdl:import
location="http://www.twinktwinklilstar.com/wsdls/star.wsdl"/>
so unholy ?

Why not accept this variant ["of course", in addition to the existing
version] as a valid wsdl import ? If not, what's the strong reason
against this?

One more question - why is targetNamespace attribute for WSDL 2.0
documents mandatory ? Is it a WS-I issue ?


rgds,
Ram
--
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!

-Ramkumar Menon
 A typical Macroprocessor
Received on Wednesday, 12 July 2006 23:44:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:41 GMT