W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2006

RE: Review of WSDL 2.0 - RDF Mapping

From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:23:18 -0500
Message-ID: <A5EEF5A4F0F0FD4DBA33093A0B075590097B6831@tayexc18.americas.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Cc: "WS-Description WG" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>


> > Doesn't Arthur's QName --> URI mapping algorithm prevent this?
> 
> When a valid WSDL file is mapped to RDF, Arthur's URI 
> fragments make sure this case doesn't happen, that's true. 
> 
> I see I was again confusing in the second half, though. It 
> tries to say that when somebody crafts an RDF file that 
> follows the ontology, they can easily use identifiers for the 
> interfaces, bindings, services etc. that do not follow 
> Arthur's scheme, and indeed they can say about the same thing 
> that it's an interface and a binding at the same time and 
> there shouldn't even be much confusion, actually.

Oh, I see.

> 
> In effect, this is a very similar point to what's being said 
> in the ending of section 3.1.
> 
> I'll try to reformulate the text to be cleaner,

Good.  Thanks!

David Booth
Received on Monday, 6 February 2006 22:25:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:38 GMT