RE: Review of WSDL 2.0 - RDF Mapping

> > Doesn't Arthur's QName --> URI mapping algorithm prevent this?
> 
> When a valid WSDL file is mapped to RDF, Arthur's URI 
> fragments make sure this case doesn't happen, that's true. 
> 
> I see I was again confusing in the second half, though. It 
> tries to say that when somebody crafts an RDF file that 
> follows the ontology, they can easily use identifiers for the 
> interfaces, bindings, services etc. that do not follow 
> Arthur's scheme, and indeed they can say about the same thing 
> that it's an interface and a binding at the same time and 
> there shouldn't even be much confusion, actually.

Oh, I see.

> 
> In effect, this is a very similar point to what's being said 
> in the ending of section 3.1.
> 
> I'll try to reformulate the text to be cleaner,

Good.  Thanks!

David Booth