W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2006

RE: Review of WSDL 2.0 - RDF Mapping

From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:42:25 -0500
Message-ID: <A5EEF5A4F0F0FD4DBA33093A0B075590097B682E@tayexc18.americas.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Cc: "WS-Description WG" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Yes, this is what I had in mind.  Thanks.  One further question though
. . .

>       * In WSDL, an interface is always a different thing 
> from a binding
>         (even if they have the same name), and they will stay 
> different
>         when mapped from a WSDL file to RDF. In the ontology, however,
>         one can assert that one resource is both an interface and a
>         binding and this introduces no RDF-level inconsistency.

Doesn't Arthur's QName --> URI mapping algorithm prevent this?

David Booth
Received on Monday, 6 February 2006 20:42:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:38 GMT