RE: Review of WSDL 2.0 - RDF Mapping

Yes, this is what I had in mind.  Thanks.  One further question though
. . .

>       * In WSDL, an interface is always a different thing 
> from a binding
>         (even if they have the same name), and they will stay 
> different
>         when mapped from a WSDL file to RDF. In the ontology, however,
>         one can assert that one resource is both an interface and a
>         binding and this introduces no RDF-level inconsistency.

Doesn't Arthur's QName --> URI mapping algorithm prevent this?

David Booth